Post by account_disabled on Jan 23, 2024 14:29:50 GMT 8
A lesson If a marketer has works, he can very easily use it to his advantage. That is why it is especially important and useful to test such products and services. Because it may not seem like it would be of any use now, but over time you may run into a similar product, where knowing the ranking algorithm can mean a lot. Let's say you can come first in a poll, on a list, which can then create additional PR and branding value. However, these algorithms can often only be learned by testing them. They will not openly write how they work or what aspects are taken into account. For example, I read a lot of articles on the topic of SEO , where they claim something about the algorithm or the operation of Google.
Or about what makes sense. And many of these items I know for a Industry Email List fact are not true. Because I tried them and they didn't work. Others, on the other hand, describe it as a fait accompli. Some example: write quality content and you will rank well in Google false write often, regularly updated pages are preferred by Google false the optimized anchor text is harmful mostly bogus SEO is dead fake These misconceptions can be revealed and validated mainly through testing. I also have some of these tests running now. If I manage to demonstrate convincing results, I will write about them in a case study over time. Also, keep in mind that if someone posts something on LinkedIn .
Growth Hacker as a title or wins an "award", it's worth checking to see if: what is all this title or award anyway? how real and valid is it all? who awarded it? Why? if an algorithm made a decision, what does it work on? Often there is hardly any performance behind them. Especially if it is "self claimed". There are titles that are really linked to results or merit, but these can also be manipulated. The higher the prestige of such a title, the more difficult it is. If someone is a New York Times Bestselling author, that already means a lot more prestige. But if someone becomes the Best Selling author in a very competitive Amazon category, that is also a serious achievement.
Or about what makes sense. And many of these items I know for a Industry Email List fact are not true. Because I tried them and they didn't work. Others, on the other hand, describe it as a fait accompli. Some example: write quality content and you will rank well in Google false write often, regularly updated pages are preferred by Google false the optimized anchor text is harmful mostly bogus SEO is dead fake These misconceptions can be revealed and validated mainly through testing. I also have some of these tests running now. If I manage to demonstrate convincing results, I will write about them in a case study over time. Also, keep in mind that if someone posts something on LinkedIn .
Growth Hacker as a title or wins an "award", it's worth checking to see if: what is all this title or award anyway? how real and valid is it all? who awarded it? Why? if an algorithm made a decision, what does it work on? Often there is hardly any performance behind them. Especially if it is "self claimed". There are titles that are really linked to results or merit, but these can also be manipulated. The higher the prestige of such a title, the more difficult it is. If someone is a New York Times Bestselling author, that already means a lot more prestige. But if someone becomes the Best Selling author in a very competitive Amazon category, that is also a serious achievement.